| Model Number |
27819 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
|
| Date of Event |
08/24/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The returned valve was patent.The valve met the requirements for siphon, and pre-implantation testing.However, the device did not meet the requirements for pressure-flow and reflux testing.There was proteinaceous debris observed within the interior and exterior of the valve.Debris within the valve may hold pressure-flow controlling mechanisms open resulting in fluid reflux.The returned valve also did not meet the requirements for leak testing due to a tear observed in the top of the delta chamber.It is unknown how or when this damage occurred.The ifu caution that ¿care should be taken in handling the valves as silicone has a low cut and tear resistance.¿ the ifu also caution that ¿improper use of instruments in the handling or implantation of shunt products may result in the cutting, slitting, or crushing of components.¿ approximately 22 cm of the catheter was returned.The returned catheter was patent and met the requirements for leak testing.Proteinaceous debris was noted in the interior and exterior of the catheter.The instructions for use that accompany the device caution that ¿shunt obstruction may occur in any of the components of the shunt system.The system may become occluded internally due to tissue fragments, blood clots, tumor cell aggregates, bacterial colonization, or other debris.¿ a review of the manufacturing records showed no anomalies.All valves are 100% tested at the time of manufacture.All catheters are 100% inspected at the time of manufacture.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported the effect of the device was poor.The valve had been adjusted without any improvement.The entire system was replaced and after the replacement, the effect improved significantly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Patient weight updated.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received reported the cause of the poor effect was poor valve diversion.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|