• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VICYL; HERNIA MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VICYL; HERNIA MESH Back to Search Results
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Swelling (2091)
Event Date 05/27/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
First surgeon dr.(b)(6) did a radical prostate cancer surgery including surgery removing cancerous tissue outside and around prostate on (b)(6) 2014.Second surgery by dr.(b)(6) on (b)(6) 2014 using 2 mesh plugs to repair mesh name vicyl and monocryl.Third surgeon dr.(b)(6) on (b)(6) 2014 used vicyl and monocryl and polypropylene to repair hernia which had become even larger, he was also unable to locate one of the plugs first put in.Now the mesh is still not holding and the hernia has become even larger and more severe pain, swelling, and when we saw the last surgeon again he advised us against another surgery, the tissue is already so damaged from mesh.Another surgery would be dangerous and most likely would not hold.In other words there is nothing left to do to help me!.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VICYL
Type of Device
HERNIA MESH
MDR Report Key6900207
MDR Text Key87768870
Report NumberMW5072520
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Patient
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/27/2017
3 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2   3  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/27/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient Weight88
-
-