|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was returned.A visual, functional and dimensional inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported material rupture was not confirmed.The reported physical resistance could not be tested as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined that the reported physical resistance appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure; however, the reported material rupture could not be confirmed.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|