• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BD INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC. S.A. DE C.V. 22 G X 1 IN. BD NEXIVA¿ DIFFUSICS¿ CLOSED IV CATHETER SYSTEM; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BD INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC. S.A. DE C.V. 22 G X 1 IN. BD NEXIVA¿ DIFFUSICS¿ CLOSED IV CATHETER SYSTEM; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 383692
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Use of Device Problem (1670); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/30/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported, the 22 g x 1 in.Bd nexiva¿ diffusics¿ closed iv catheter system was difficult to operate and compromised the patient¿s cannula during use.After inserting into the patient it became difficult to separate and pull them apart.When it finally separated, the needle was out of the arm and came upward with enough force to pierce through the plastic and almost repunctured the patient¿s skin.The patient had to have a new iv inserted.There was no report of injury or medical intervention.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: during the sample evaluation was review the following: the washer retention component was reviewed in order to confirm if a correct washer was assembled during the manufacturing process and it show the correct assembly, the adhesive amount was review in order to confirm if the cannula was bonded to the grip component and it was found bonded correctly, also the catheter adapter was review per damage component and no issues were detected, during the device component evaluation was not found the cannula separated from grip or tip shield component.Returned material showed reported defect no.Assembly, the adhesive amount was review in order to confirm if the cannula was bonded to the grip component and it was found bonded correctly, also the catheter adapter was review per damage component and not issues were detected, during the device component evaluation was not found the cannula separated from grip or tip shield component.Returned material showed reported defect? no.No sample retention for nexiva diffusics product.Batch number 7004697 was reported.Nexiva diffusics family.A complaint history check was performed and this is the 1st related complaint reported for the defect/condition on lot number 7004697.Dhr for lot number 7004697 was reviewed and no qn¿s there are related to this lot#, during the dhr review no issues for needle disengagement difficult or separate from the during our q.A technician inspection were detected.Material 383692 with lot number 7004697 was manufactured on january 2017.During dhr review it was confirm that the qa technician performed the sampling plan per cannula pull test defect and adhesive placed correctly through the all lot manufactured as correspond and no issues were recorded, additionally all functional testing and product performance meets specification criteria, accepting and releasing this lot.All relevant information during the dhr review shown that meet all established manufacturing criteria.During the manufacturing review was detected the failure mode difficult disengagement to the lot # 7214870 catalog: ns383552, the quality nonconformance was opened through notification # 200704540.Issue previously reported for associated product family during the manufacturing process.The complaint rate remains at historical levels as observed on records.No trending observed.Investigation conclusion: bd was able to duplicate the customer¿s indicated failure mode because during a manufacturing process a similar incident was detected but the defect was not evident in the testing of the returned sample.Product within specification? yes.Root cause description: we could not confirm a specific root cause for this issue since the sample or photo sent for evaluation didn¿t show the defect mentioned before, however the followings actions were implemented in the manufacturing process in order to prevent this failure mode occurrence during the process assembly, it was documented thought the (b)(4).Rationale: no capa was opened for this issue however this issue was addressed in a quality notification 200704540 in order to prevent this failure mode into de the manufacturing process.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
22 G X 1 IN. BD NEXIVA¿ DIFFUSICS¿ CLOSED IV CATHETER SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BD INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC. S.A. DE C.V.
periferico luis donaldo
colosio no. 579
nogales
Manufacturer (Section G)
BD INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC. S.A. DE C.V.
periferico luis donaldo
colosio no. 579
nogales
Manufacturer Contact
brett wilko
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015652845
MDR Report Key6907133
MDR Text Key88112173
Report Number9610847-2017-00085
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FOZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K161777
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,other,user facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/02/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date12/31/2019
Device Catalogue Number383692
Device Lot Number7004697
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/25/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/07/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/02/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-