|
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST 40 PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
CQF7564 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Deflation Problem (1149)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
08/09/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No hospital/medical records or medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure in a left upper arm graft at the arterial anastomosis, the health care provider allegedly had difficulties deflating the pta balloon.Reportedly, the original pta balloon was used to complete the procedure and subsequently was successfully removed through the sheath at the conclusion of the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records were reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Conclusion: the definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural issues contributed to the event.It should be noted that per the reported event details, it was stated that the device was inflated with a syringe.The ifu (instructions for use) states that the use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended to prevent over pressurization.It is unknown whether the balloon/catheter was over-pressurized or the use of a syringe contributed to the event.The device was returned for evaluation.A visual inspection did not find an deflation-related defects with the device.The device was inflated with an in-house inflation device, and was able to be fully deflated in approximately 5 seconds.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported deflation issue.Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings: do not exceed the rbp recommended for this device.Balloon rupture may occur if the rbp rating is exceeded.To prevent over pressurization, use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended.When the catheter is exposed to the vascular system, it should be manipulated while under high-quality fluoroscopic observation.Do not advance or retract the catheter unless the balloon is fully deflated.If resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.Applying excessive force to the catheter can result in tip breakage or balloon separation.Precautions: if resistance is felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter through the introducer sheath, determine if contrast is trapped in the balloon with fluoroscopy.If contrast is present, push the balloon out of the sheath and then completely evacuate the contrast before proceeding to withdraw the balloon.If resistance is still felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter, it is recommended to remove the balloon catheter and guidewire/introducer sheath as a single unit.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure in a left upper arm graft at the arterial anastomosis, the health care provider allegedly had difficulties deflating the pta balloon.Reportedly, the original pta balloon was used to complete the procedure and subsequently was successfully removed through the sheath at the conclusion of the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|