• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Problems Break (1069); Peeled/Delaminated (1454); Stretched (1601); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/06/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Information references the main component of the system, other applicable components are: product id 3387-28, implanted: (b)(6) 2017, product type lead.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a health care provider (hcp) via a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator.It was reported that the patient was implanted with the deep brain stimulation (dbs) lead on (b)(6) 2017.On (b)(6) 2017 the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was implanted and during the procedure when the right side lead cap was removed, the electrode conductors on the lead were detached from the lead coating; the conductor wires were exposed.It was also noted that procedure was performed as usual when the event occurred and there was no particular forced used to cause the issue.The lead remained in use as the hcp decided that if necessary, a new lead would be positioned.The rep also stated that "beriplast is usually used as adhesive bond to suture dura, however, duraseal blue spray (integra company) was used for the first time in this procedure.The spray might have been applied to the lead coating." to resolve the exposed conductor wires, the lead coating was covered by plastic materials and tightened with thread; the wires were no longer exposed.Follow-up with the health care provider (hcp) indicated that they considered the exposed conductor wires to be coiled initially but were stretched.The wires were covered by a boot for protection and no abnormal impedances were observed; the lead remained in use.It was then stated that per the hcp, "during removing a boot used for the extension after removing the extension rather than during removing the extension for test stimulation, the boot was interfered/entrapped by some factor and it led to split the electrode conductors and its coating; the conductor wires were exposed.Two boots were covered the exposed wires".It was unknown if the event was resolved at the time of this report.There was no known impact or consequence to the patient.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The lead s/n (b)(4) was not returned.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a manufacturing representative.It was reported that at the time of the report two boots with the same size were tied with a non-absorbable suture.They needed to confirm whether or not there was an issue with the strength.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from a hcp via a rep clarified that the lead was damaged but the cause was undetermined.It was inquired by the hcp if the lead could possibly be kinked and/or damaged while a boot was passed through the lead in order to avoid the same issue.No further complications are anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6914049
MDR Text Key88157993
Report Number3007566237-2017-04173
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P960009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/22/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/02/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/06/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/04/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/05/2017
11/01/2017
11/20/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/30/2017
11/14/2017
11/22/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberZ-0187-2009
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-