|
According to the complainant, she reported ".Nothing different was done on day in question from her normal bedtime and morning routine, except she had some candy on (b)(6) approximately "a few hours before testing at 10:02pm which is unusual since i never eat candy.".Based on the 291 reading, the consumer stated that ".Her pump suggested she'd take "around 5-7 units of insulin' i don't remember but it was quite a large amount.I usually cut the amount of insulin suggested in half, but i didn't do that this time around." the complainant reported she 'took' the suggested amount of insulin in which she does not remember and "went to sleep a little after testing".According to the complainant's husband, at approximately 2:50am the complainant 'rolled out of bed', 'fell on the floor' and 'hit her head'.The husband immediately called their daughter.When complainant's daughter arrived she checked her blood glucose at 3:11am her result at that time was 74 mg/dl.The complainant reported she was "sweating, confused and felt sick to her stomach" the consumer attempted to suspend her pump but she "felt so disoriented that forgot how to do so".The consumer's daughter gave her a cup of white cranberry juice within 5 minutes of testing, she took her to the bathroom to get cleaned up and tested again at 3:27am.Consumer's daughter gave her another cup of white cranberry juice and contacted the consumer's doctor.The doctor advised the daughter to immediately take the consumer to the er.Before leaving to the er consumer's daughter checked her mother's blood glucose again at 3:46am getting a result of 106 mg/dl.They then drove the consumer to the hospital.According to the consumer they arrived to the er at approx.4:00am.The doctors checked the consumer's bg using their unk meter against the nml meter at 4:09am.The user does not recall what the doctor's meter read or if there was a variance.She said, ".She threw up once she got to the er and "was not given any food, drink or medication that she can recall." the user reported her pump was also suspended once she got to the er.In the meantime the doctors kept checking consumer's blood glucose using their meter against her nova max link meter, again the consumer "does not recall the readings the doctors were getting or if there was a variance".On friday the consumer "started feeling a little better" and put her pump back on voluntarily.The test strips in question were used up while she was in the hospital and the vial was discarded.The consumer was admitted until saturday to be monitored due to her falling off the bed and hitting her head.The consumer was discharged with instructions to follow up with her hcp and contact the meter's company.The consumer opened a new vial of ts when she got home of lot #: 1021316111, exp.Date: 04/30/2018, cr: 82-127 and has been getting results she felt "comfortable with" during the call to customer support, it was revealed that the consumer did not perform a control solution test for integrity before use their initial test strips as instructed in our directions for use.Per label copy/ package insert - high or low blood glucose results can indicate potentially serious medical conditions.In case of an unexpected result, you should repeat the test using a new test strip.If the result is still unexpected, or the reading is not consistent with how you feel, contact your hcp and treat as prescribed.Any change in the treatment of your diabetes should be discussed with your hcp.Nova max test strip insert- quality control.- checking the system control solution test: the nova max control solution is used as a quality control check to make sure that your blood glucose monitor and the nova max glucose test strips are working correctly.Do a control solution test: each time you open a new vial of test strips.- storage and handling keep the nova max glucose test strips vial tightly closed when not in use.Test strips should be stored only in the original vial.Meter is expected to be returned for evaluation.
|