|
The area representative reported attending an aortic aneurysm repair of an angulated posterior diving aorta.As reported, when the physician was attempting to deploy the zenith renu aaa ancillary graft main body extension it was very hard to push up the top cap.A significant amount of force was needed in order to release the suprarenal stents.In spite of the difficulty, the procedure was completed successfully.There were no adverse effects or consequences to the patient.
|
|
Investigation/evaluation: the zenith renu aaa ancillary graft main body extension was not returned for an evaluation and no photographs were provided.Without the complaint device, a physical investigation was not able to be completed.A review of complaint history, the device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control data was conducted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to this event.The device history record was reviewed and zero non-conformances were noted.Each zenith device is shipped with instructions for use (ifu), that lists the indications for use, contraindications, warnings and precautions, and the correct deployment procedure.Per the ifu: inspect the device and packaging to verify that no damage has occurred as a result of shipping.If damage has occurred, do not use the product and return to cook.Do not bend or kink the delivery system.Doing so may cause damage to the delivery system and the zenith renu aaa ancillary graft.Do not continue advancing any portion of the delivery system if resistance is felt during advancement of the wire guide or delivery system.Stop and asses the cause of resistance; vessel, catheter or graft damage may occur.Exercise particular care in areas of stenosis, intravascular thrombosis or in calcified or tortuous vessels.Significant force in advancing the top cap can be caused by tortuous anatomy, narrowed vessels calcification, or a barb protruding from the top cap.The complaint report noted, "it was an angulated posterior diving aorta." the possible root cause of the complaint is patient condition-related.However, based on the information provided, no product returned, and the results of our investigation; a definitive root cause could not be determined.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.The appropriate personnel have been notified of this event.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.
|