|
The reported anchor was discarded by the user facility; therefore, an evaluation was not completed.However, the complaint was verified by pictures sent by the facility, which showed the damaged anchor.Manufacturing documents were reviewed and all units within this lot met specification before shipment.A two-year review of complaint history revealed a total of four similar complaints with this being the only anchor involved in a procedural approach change from arthroscopic to open.A risk analysis was performed and found to be acceptable.The anchors most likely pulled out due to the patients' poor bone quality.The surgeon was having difficulty getting the tip of the anchor to stay inside the pilot hole when he was tensioning the suture.He used a mallet to force the anchor in the pilot hole which is likely to be the cause of the tip deforming/bending.To reduce the risk of injury to the patient, the product's instructions for use (ifu) provides the following warnings and precautions: -patient should be advised that product materials may cause allergic reactions including but not limited to, foreign body reaction, tissue irritation/inflammation or other allergic reactions.Where material sensitivity is suspected, appropriate tests should be made and sensitivity ruled out prior to implantation.-conditions which tend to limit the patient's ability or willingness to restrict activities or follow directions during the healing and rehabilitation period.-detailed instructions on the use and limitations of the device should be given to the patient before implantation.-the patient should be told to follow the surgeon's protocol for postoperative management.-preoperative and operating procedures, including knowledge of surgical techniques and proper selection and placement of the implant are important considerations in the successful utilization of this device.
|