| Model Number |
GJ-1410-15 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Perforation (2001); Injury (2348); Bowel Perforation (2668)
|
| Date of Event |
09/14/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The actual device was not returned for evaluation, but a review of the device history record was performed and no anomalies were found.Amt agrees with the doctor's assessment that the jejunal perforation was caused by the patient's condition and the placement procedure, not the device itself.All information reasonably known at this time has been included in this report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up report will be provided.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to amt.We have assigned (b)(4) to this report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Based on the reported information from the doctor, the doctor was involved in an operation with a (b)(6) patient with down syndrome.The patient had many health factors at play, including duodenal atresia.The doctor went into the placement with knowledge that there was a high risk due to the patient's situation, but had decided that attempting the procedure was still the best option.The patient experienced a jejunal perforation from the placement procedure as confirmed by the radiologist.The radiologist involved with the case does not blame the amt device and only provided the information to amt for reporting purposes.Based on the doctor's analysis, he believes that the g-jet device did not cause the perforation and it was the patient's other factors that lead to the issues experienced from the placement procedure.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|