|
Revision due to infection.(b)(6) 2013, mr (b)(6)'s knee started to discharge.His blood tests ((b)(6) 2013) were esr 65; crp 29.5.(9.5.2013) esr 63; crp 25.This man has a definite infection of his knee.His sinus has been swabbed today.He now requires an urgent two stage revision of his infected total knee replacement.Mr (b)(6)'s first stage should be done as soon as possible.If his knee dries up and his cultures are clear, he may be suitable for a two stage revision at one sitting.Stage 1 - removal of duofix knee replacement.Letter of claim received 13 dec 2016.Additional information confirmed pain, swelling and poor range of movement- (b)(6) 2016.Update jul 18, 2017: email notification from (b)(6) received.Email notification confirmed that this complaint is now being actively litigated.This complaint was updated on: aug 15, 2017.Swelling and poor range of movement - (b)(6) 2016.Update sep 22, 2017.Medical records reviewed.Primary operative note (b)(6) 2007 indicates the patient received a left total knee replacement due to osteoarthritis.Completed without indication of complication by the surgeon.Procedure note (b)(6) 2012 indicate the patient received a left total knee arthroscopy with synovial biopsy.Comments of procedure reveal the joint to be very scarred and hard to navigate.Some scoring of the femoral condyles in keeping with hydroxyapatite wear was also noted.Pathology report (b)(6) 2012 reveals reactive periprosthetic fibrous tissue with metal pigment deposition, secondary to prosthetic wear debris type reaction.Office note (b)(6) 2013 indicates the patient presents with increasing left total knee pain described as burning, revision procedure is decided upon.Operative explantation note (b)(6) 2013 indicates the patient received a removal of duofix knee replacement due to infected left total knee.Indication for procedure reveals that pre-operative arthroscopy demonstrated scratches on the metal and plastic.Along with increased swelling and pain, infection superimposed of mechanical failure of duofix knee.Intra-operative findings include pus, metallosis and turgid capsule which was excised.Components were found to be loose; removed with osteotomes and gigli saw.A large patellar cavitary defect and two tibial cavitary defects were identified.There was also osteolysis of both femoral condyles, surgeon indicated an allograft will be required.Operative re-implantation note (b)(6) 2013 indicates the patient received a re-implantation 11 weeks post-spacers of a tc3 total knee system.A large contained tibial defect was identified along with small lateral tibial defect.Graft was impacted into the defects.Please note, these defects were identified at time of previous total knee explant and implant of spacers.Office notes (b)(6) 2014 indicate the patient is having ¿night sweats.¿ isotope bone scan reveals increased uptake around the femoral and tibial components.Office notes (b)(6) 2014 indicate inflammatory markers have decreased, next review in 6 months.At this time, an additional revision surgery has not been identified.Please note, parts of the medical records are either hand written and illegible or poorly copied and unreadable.This statement represents a very small percentage of the document.Updated 10-18-2017.
|
|
Revision due to infection (b)(6) 2013, the patient's knee started to discharge.His blood tests ((b)(6) 2013) were esr 65; crp 29.5.(9.5.2013) esr 63; crp 25.This man has a definite infection of his knee.His sinus has been swabbed today.He now requires an urgent two stage revision of his infected total knee replacement.The patient's first stage should be done as soon as possible.If his knee dries up and his cultures are clear, he may be suitable for a two stage revision at one sitting.Stage 1 - removal of duofix knee replacement.Letter of claim received (b)(4) 2016.Additional information confirmed pain, swelling and poor range of movement- kw (b)(6) 2016 update jul 18, 2017: email notification from kennedys received.Email notification confirmed that this complaint is now being actively litigated.This complaint was updated on: 2017.Swelling and poor range of movement - kw 2016.The reported event has been evaluated and will be monitored.Depuy considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|