|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.The xience alpine everolimus eluting coronary stent system instructions for use states: although the safety and effectiveness of treating more than one lesion per coronary artery with xience alpine stents have not been established, if this is performed, place the stent in the distal lesion before the proximal lesion in order to minimize dislodgement risk incurred by traversing through deployed stents.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties appear to be related to the use error as it is likely the device interacted with the previously implanted stent during advancement resulting in the reported failure to advance and material deformation (flared stent).Further interaction with the previously implanted stent during retraction of the stent delivery system (sds) likely contributed to the reported difficult to remove.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|
|
It was reported that during a saphenous vein graft procedure in the circumflex artery, which did not have any tortuosity or calcification, an attempt was made to cross a 2.5 x 12 mm xience alpine stent through an unspecified implanted stent in the lesion.However, the xience alpine stent failed to cross the lesion because it got stuck with the implanted stent, and the struts of the xience alpine stent became flared as well.The alpine stent catheter system was therefore pulled out of the anatomy, and dilatation was done in the lesion.Another 2.5 x 12 mm xience alpine stent was then implanted to successfully complete the procedure.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|