| Model Number |
G48378 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Entrapment of Device (1212); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Structural Problem (2506); Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Anxiety (2328)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Exemption number e2016032.William cook europe aps (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi) (importer).Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).D4) catalog#: igtcfs-65-uni-celect-perm.G1) name and address for importer site: cook medical incorporated (cmi) 400 daniels way bloomington, in 47404 registration no.: 3005580113.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Description of event according to initial reporter: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2012".Additional information received on 10oct2017: patient received an implant on (b)(6) 2012 via the right common femoral vein due to deep vein thrombosis.Patient outcome: patient is alleging migration, tilt, vena cava perforation, embedment and anxiety due to the device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).Corrected data based on new information received: adverse event and product problem to product problem.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating 'celect, migration, tilt, vena cava perforation, embedment, anxiety'.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Manipulation in the area of the filter implant may cause migration or contribute to changes in the filter configuration and placement.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae.E.G.Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature and may occur during placement or during implanting period.Unknown if the reported anxiety is directly related to the filter and unable to identify corresponding failure mode(s) at this time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: organ (mesenteric) perforation.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information has been provided at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.Exemption number e2016032.William cook europe aps (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi) (importer).G1) name and address for importer site: cook medical incorporated (cmi) 400 daniels way bloomington, in 47404 registration no.: 3005580113.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per ct report, (b)(6) 2017, ivc filter noted.Tilting of the apex of the embedment of the apex filter into the ivc wall.There is approximately 13 degree tilt.There is also perforation of the primary struts into the mesentery.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information provided at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation ¿ investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Per quality engineering review, the additional information provided for this complaint does not change the previous investigation conclusion.Therefore, no new investigation activities will be conducted at this time.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable, or unchanged.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|