|
The associated complaint devices were returned.The damage observed on the press fit stem is consistent with implant extraction damage.The fractured ends have been burnished to a smooth surface.This was likely caused by the fractured ends of the stem rubbing prior to extraction.Damage seen on the cement stem, on the tibial baseplate¿s polished and anterior surfaces, and on the post bushing could have been caused during removal.Wear seen on the articular surface of the femoral assembly may have been caused by third body debris or during removal.Wear seen on the hinge sleeve was likely caused by normal use.The amount of cement seen on the fixation surface indicates that there may compromised bone stock.Damage observed on the articular surface of the tibial insert may have been caused by third-body particulate or during the removal.The implant was received with the femoral assembly attached to the tibial baseplate.The tibial baseplate set screws have been cemented in place and can be felt inside of the female taper.No deviations were observed during the lab analysis.The batch number of the fractured press fit stem is unknown.Without the requested medical images, the root cause cannot be concluded.The patient¿s weight, the known distal defects, and thin femoral condyles together with a well fixed proximal femoral stem might have contributed to fracture.The noted quantity of bone cement of the femoral component indicates that it is likely that there was less stability of the component, which could lead to micro motion and stress on the stem.Wear to the fracture surfaces of the stem documented in the lab analysis prohibited the fatigue stress assessment.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.
|