|
Additional information received reported the patient was a female with date of birth (b)(6).Also, the reason for explant was because the patient was not happy with the lens and wanted a monofocal lens.There was no other visual issues known.Also, the implant date was (b)(6) 2017, and the explant date was (b)(6) 2017.There was no incision enlargement or vitrectomy when removing the lens.Reportedly, the diopter of the replacement lens was 17.0.The surgeon was reported as dr.Douglas grayson and the patient's outcome after surgery is good.No additional information was provided.Age/date of birth: (b)(6).Gender/sex: female.If implanted, give date: (b)(6) 2017.If explanted, give date: (b)(6) 2017.Device available for evaluation?: yes, returned to manufacturer on 10/23/2017.Initial reporter name: dr.(b)(6).Health professional: yes.Occupation: physician.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.The product is inspected by a qualified inspector using a 12x magnification.It can be seen that the lens is cut, there is a scratch on the posterior side and it is damaged on the posterior side.The product was most likely damaged due to explant.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search on complaints revealed that no similar complaints were received for this production order number.As a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
|