• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. VALVE PEDIATRIQUE P CSD; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. VALVE PEDIATRIQUE P CSD; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0147CSD
Device Problems Partial Blockage (1065); Device Operational Issue (2914); Programming Issue (3014)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 05/05/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation a follow up report will be filed.
 
Event Description
Valve mis-function female patient per (b)(6).Valve blocked, can not be set in situ: it was impossible to modify the pressure.Valve was removed and replaced.No patient consequences reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned for evaluation.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected udi: device was made prior to compliance date, (b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation it was noted that the images were taken of the ¿as received¿ valve.The valve was visually inspected; no defects were noted.The position of the cam when valve was received was 150 mmh2o.The valve was hydrated.The valve was tested for programming with programmer 82-3126 with serial (b)(4) and programmer 82-3190 with serial (b)(4), the valve failed the test, the cam mechanism did not move during the programming process.The valve was flushed, the valve passed the test no occlusion was noted.The valve was leak tested, leaked from the needle holes.The valve was reflux tested.The valve failed the test.The valve was dried.The valve was then pressure tested at a 150 mmh20, the valve failed.The valve was dismantled and was examined under microscope at appropriate magnification: biological debris was found on the spring, on the ruby ball, on the seat of the ruby ball, and on the cam mechanism.The cam magnets were also controlled.The magnets failed.The magnets polarity was controlled failed all magnets were on ( - ).Review of the history device records for the valve product code 0147csd with lot chmbn1 conformed to the specifications when released to stock on the 29th october 2007.The abnormal polarization of the valve was probably caused by an exposition of a too strong magnetic field.Further details in chpv mri testing conducted.Based on the results of this investigation no further action is required.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VALVE PEDIATRIQUE P CSD
Type of Device
SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC.
Manufacturer Contact
james kenney
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088282726
MDR Report Key6974210
MDR Text Key90125223
Report Number1226348-2017-10789
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
N/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/24/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2012
Device Catalogue Number0147CSD
Device Lot NumberCHMBN1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/13/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/05/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/29/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age37 YR
-
-