| Catalog Number |
03.010.401 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.No patient involvement reported.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.Device history records review was conducted.The report indicates that the: dhr review: part # 03.010.401.Synthes lot # 1751300.Supplier lot # 1751300.Release to warehouse date: 09 dec 2009.Supplier: (b)(4).No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the percutaneous insertion handle for femoral nails was broken at the nail interface (tab that connects to nail is broken off) found in sterile processing and a t.Handle was noted to be spinning and no locking and turning during general inspection.This complaint is for one device.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Customer quality conducted an investigation of the returned device.The insertion handle was returned with the entire tab broken off.This complaint is confirmed.The t-handle was repaired by service and repair and then returned to the customer.A visual inspection, drawing and device history record review were performed as part of this investigation.Further material and hardness testing is not applicable at this time as they were tested at the time of manufactured and confirmed to have no issues through the dhr review.Visual inspection revealed that the entire tab had broken off the insertion handle, additionally the entire device shows signs of wear.A dimensional analysis is not applicable at this time as the relevant features were broken off and not returned.Drawings were reviewed and were determined to be suitable for the intended design, application and dimensional conformity when used as recommended.Dhr review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Whether this complaint can be replicated is not applicable because the device was returned broken.A definitive root cause could not be determined but it is likely that the device bent over repeated use, eventually leading to the breakage.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|