| Model Number |
9004 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Reocclusion (1985); Claudication (2550)
|
| Date of Event |
10/04/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Analysis: the sample was not returned from the user facility; therefore, device evaluations are unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed there are no similar complaints associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the lot was manufactured to specification.Conclusion: the actual sample was not received for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.The investigator assessed that the event was definitely related to the study device or procedure.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided will all relevant information.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the left proximal third of the superficial femoral artery (sfa).Approximately 17 months after the index procedure, the patient¿s sfa vessel was reportedly reoccluded.No additional intervention has been performed at this time.The investigator assessed that the event was definitely related to the study device or procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and not available for further evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Lot history review revealed this is the only complaint related to an allegation of reocclusion for this lot.The dhr review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the actual sample was not returned for evaluation.It was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the left proximal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Approximately 17 months after the index procedure, the patient¿s left sfa vessel was reportedly reoccluded.No additional intervention was performed at that time.The investigator assessed that the event was definitely related to the study device and index procedure.Approximately 36 months after the index procedure, the patient presented with pain in the left leg due to reocclusion of target lesion.The health care professional chose to do an angiogram and a revascularization.The hcp deemed the revascularization was successful.The sample was discarded by the user facility and is not available for further evaluation.No further adverse patient effects were reported.A definitive root cause could not be determined based on the information provided.Label review: based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.Section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the left proximal third of the superficial femoral artery (sfa).Approximately 17 months after the index procedure, the patient¿s sfa vessel was reportedly reoccluded.No additional intervention has been performed at this time.The investigator assessed that the event was definitely related to the study device or procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and not available for further evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported.New information: it was reported through a clinical study approximately three years post index procedure, a duplex ultrasound was performed and identified stenosis at the target lesion.It was further reported that revasculation was successfully performed.Study was completed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|