Returned to manufacturer on.An event regarding wear involving an insert was reported.The event was confirmed.Visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated (b)(6) 2017.It states "the parts were examined with the aid of a stereo microscope at magnifications up to 50x.Explantation damage was observed on the insert.Areas with no machining lines were observed on the distal surface of the insert.Burnishing, scratching and third-body indentations were observed on the insert.These are common damage modes of uhmpwe.Yellow discoloration was also observed on the insert, consistent with absorption of synovial fluid." a material analysis has been performed.The report concluded: "burnishing, scratching and third-body indentations were observed on the insert.These are common damage modes of uhmpwe.Yellow discoloration was also observed on the insert, consistent with absorption of synovial fluid.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined." medical records received and evaluation: a principal contributor to the present knee instability was the relatively high posterior tibial slope of the baseplate with an angle of 8°.Under normal implantation conditions, this should never be more than 5°, usually between 0° - 5°.Dhr review for the reported lot determined that the device was manufactured and packed to specification.Complaint history review confirmed that there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.A review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: baseplate malposition in high posterior tibial slope has contributed to flexion instability with overload in the arthroplasty and consequently abnormal bearing wear requiring revision with tibial bearing exchange.No further investigation is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|