The reason for this revision surgery was a revision of total elbow.The in-vivo length of patient service for the implant was 1.8 years.There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this revision surgery.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.Review of the device history record (dhr) of the explanted part (s) was not conducted as a device history record has not been provided or received at this time.The device history record has been requested from zimmer and when received it will be reviewed.If the review indicates appropriate action should taken the complaint will be re-evaluated to address any issues.This complaint will be closed pending receipt of the device history record.No further action is deemed necessary at this time.The complaint investigation history was reviewed and no trends or on-going issues were deemed to be present or in need of review.No further action is deemed necessary at this time.This event is deemed as non-product related.The root cause for this event was to revise the patient to satisfy the surgeon's concerns.The scope of this investigation is limited without having the explanted parts available to djo surgical for evaluation.Other conditions relating to this event could not be determined with confidence.Inventory containment is not required since there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|