|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of hubt1756 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged dilator tip was confirmed and the cause appeared to be use related.It was reported that the dilator was found to be deformed upon opening the kit; however, blood residue was observed throughout the returned 4.5fr introducer.A slight bend was observed in the vessel dilator that coincided with the distal end of the sheath.Deformation, which is consistent with wear against a guidewire, was observed at the distal tip of the dilator.Due to evidence of use and deformation that is consistent with wear against a guidewire, it was determined that the dilator was damaged during use.A lot history review (lhr) of hubt1756 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|