Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.No patient involvement reported.Date of event: unknown.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Date returned to manufacturer.Device history records review was conducted.The report indicates that the: part # 352.040 and lot # 9650042.Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 03.Nov.2015.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported that the top of the reamer shaft is not connecting with reamer heads.This was discovered in sterile processing.There was no patient involvement.This complaint involves one device.Concomitant devices reported:reamer head (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity # 1).This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
A product evaluation/investigation summary was performed.Investigation summary: it was reported that the top of the reamer shaft is not connecting with reamer heads.This was discovered in sterile processing.There was no patient involvement.Customer quality (cq) engineering investigation: this complaint was not able to be confirmed.First, a visual inspection revealed minor wear to the returned device but nothing that would inhibit function.Secondly, a functional test was not able to be performed at cq as the reamer head(s) involved in the event were not returned.Thirdly, a dimensional inspection of feature(s) related to this complaint could not be performed because pertinent dimensions (distal coupling inside diameter, outside diameter) per coupling component drawing are before the slotting process.No new malfunctions were identified as a result of the investigation.Investigation methods/evaluation results a visual inspection under 5x magnification, device history record (dhr) review and drawing review were performed at cq for the returned device as part of this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.A functional test was not able to be performed at cq as the reamer head(s) involved in the event were not returned.Assembly drawing revisions a&b and coupling component drawing were reviewed during this investigation.A dimensional inspection of feature(s) related to this complaint could not be performed because pertinent dimensions (distal coupling inside diameter, outside diameter) per coupling component drawing are before the slotting process.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|