|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of (b)(4) showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leak is inconclusive due to poor sample condition.One 2 fr single lumen per-q-cath was returned for evaluation.An initial visual observation showed a clamp indentation and adhesive residue on the extension leg of the t-lock.The catheter appeared to have been trimmed approximately 0.7 cm distal to the distal end of the strain relief.The sample was flushed and pressurized with a 12 ml syringe of water.The sample was found to be patent to infusion and aspiration, however, no leaks were found.A microscopic observation revealed no holes or splits in the catheter.Striations were observed on the surface of the distal end of the catheter, indicating it was cut with a ground-sharpened instrument.No leaks were found in the returned sample; however, since only approximately 0.7 cm of the catheter was returned for evaluation, the complaint of a leak is inconclusive at this time.Possible causes of a leak include stylet damage, sharp instrument damage, and over pressurization.A lot history review (lhr) of rebt1329 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|