On (b)(6) 2017, the reporter (mother) for the patient contacted lifescan (lfs) alleging that her daughters onetouch verio flex meter was reading inaccurately low compared to another meter.The complaint was classified based on the customer care advocate (cca) documentation.The reporter detailed that the alleged issue first began on (b)(6) 2017, in the morning.In the first week of (b)(6) 2017, the patient obtained an alleged glucose result of 35mg/dl on the subject meter compared to 127 mg/dl on the other meter.Meter to other meter comparisons do not reasonably suggest that a malfunction has occurred.There can be no presumption as to which meter¿s reading is erroneous as the comparison is not made to a calibrated reference method.The reporter stated that the patient manages her diabetes with insulin (self-adjuster) and was immediately given food (carbs) by the reporter (mother) in response to the alleged product issue.The reporter stated on and unspecified time later that day the patient developed symptoms of ¿abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting¿.The patient was then admitted to hospital and was given an anti-nausea medicine (zofran) by an hcp.The reporter was not able to specify the diabetes treatment that was administered to the patient.At the time of trouble shooting, the cca confirmed that the subject meter was set to the correct unit of measure, the sample was taken from an approved sample site and the correct testing steps were used.The reporter confirmed that the test strip vial was not cracked or broken and the test strips were stored correctly and within expiry date.The reporter did not have control solution to perform a test.Replacement products were sent to the patient and requested back for evaluation.This complaint is being reported because the patient reportedly developed signs and/or symptoms that meet lfs¿ criteria for a serious injury adverse event after the alleged product issue began and reportedly received hcp intervention as a result of the alleged product issue.
|
The lay user/patients meter and test strips have been returned and evaluated by lifescan product analysis with the following findings: the meter passed all testing with no faults found.The reported issue could not be confirmed.Lifescan also conducted an evaluation of the test strip lot and concluded that this lot did not breach the thresholds set for escalation and no systemic issue was observed.Analysis was not possible for the returned test strips due to unknown storage and handling preventing the allegation being physically investigated.If lifescan obtains additional information regarding this complaint, a follow-up report will be submitted.At this time, lifescan considers this matter closed.
|