|
Additional information received reported that there was no visual issues and just a refractive surprise.There was no incision enlargement, vitrectomy, or capsule tear.Reportedly, the patient is doing well post-operatively.Also, the doctor's name was dr.Christopher lin, the implant date was (b)(6) 2017, and the explant date was (b)(6) 2017.No additional information was provided.If implanted, give date: (b)(6) 2017.If explanted, give date: (b)(6) 2017.Device available for evaluation: yes returned to manufacturer on: 11/24/2017.Device returned to manufacturer: yes.Initial reporter name: dr.(b)(6).Health professional: yes.Occupation: physician.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection with the unaided eye shows the product is damaged and incomplete, most probably to make explant possible.Considering the condition of the lens additional analysis is not possible.The customer's reported event could not be confirmed.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search on complaints revealed that no similar complaints were received for this production order number.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions along with warnings for the proper use and handling of the device.As a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
|