• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C1857
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 11/02/2017
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet locks was intact on the proximal end of the first evaluated ruby coil.The introducer sheath was ovalized approximately 7.0 cm from the distal tip of the introducer sheath on the first ruby coil evaluated.The embolization coil for the first ruby coil was intact with its pusher assembly.The outer diameter (od) of the embolization coil to the first evaluated ruby coil was measured to be within specification.Conclusions: evaluation of the first ruby coil revealed that the introducer sheath was ovalized.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the rotating hemostasis valve (rhv) is overtightened during use, damage such as ovalization to the introducer sheath may occur for the first ruby coil evaluated.The od of the embolization coil was measured to be within specification.The first evaluated ruby coil was advanced through a demonstration microcatheter; resistance was encountered as the proximal end of the embolization coil passed through the ovalization in the introducer sheath.The ruby coil was advanced completely through the demonstration microcatheter and out of the distal tip.The ovalization in the introducer sheath likely contributed to the resistance experience during procedure.Evaluation of the second returned ruby coil revealed that the proximal end of the introducer sheath was ovalized.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the introducer sheath is forcefully handled during use, damage such as ovalization may occur.The returned ruby coil could not be advanced out of its introducer sheath and through a demonstration microcatheter during the functional test.The root cause of the reported resistance could not be determined.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-02097.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the splenic artery using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician used a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern) to deploy and detach multiple ruby coils to the target location.The physician then switched to a new lantern with a different tip shape to continue the procedure.The physician successfully deployed and detached a ruby coil using the lantern; then felt resistance while advancing two new ruby coils more than two thirds of the way through the lantern.The ruby coils were therefore removed, and the procedure was completed using additional ruby coils and pod coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key7065576
Report Number3005168196-2017-02096
Device Sequence Number19197802
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013060
UDI-Public00814548013060
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAZ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K120330
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 11/02/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Physician
Device Expiration Date02/05/2025
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C1857
Device Lot NumberF74302
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/10/2017
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/02/2017
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/28/2017
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age58 YR
Patient Weight120
-
-