(b)(4).The product lot number is unknown and the following are potential lots/manufacturer date/expiration dates: (1) 160601h/05-31-16 thru 06-01-16/may 31, 2021 (2) 161101h/11-01-2016 thru 11-02-16/october 31, 2021 (3) 161208h/12-08-16 thru 12-10-2016/november 30, 2021.The actual sample photo was obtained for investigation.The image revealed that the catheter was damaged and inflected.The damaged portion appeared to be a smooth cut.Details were unable to be identified from the photo base observation.Retention samples, three pieces per lot, were observed.No anomalies were found.The manufacture inspection record was traced back to the potential lot.No defective properties were detected.There has been no similar events reported for the concerned lot by other medical institutions.The exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.The potential for such an event is addressed in the instructions-for-use (ifu) with statements as the following: do not attempt to re-insert a partially or a completely withdrawn needle.(b)(4).
|
The user facility reported catheter damage with the involved device during a procedure.Follow up communication with the user facility reported the following information: during a medical checkup on (b)(6), the patient was administered on the upper right arm and it was secured with a 18g.The patient wanted to stay overnight and on (b)(6), the doctor decided to remove one of unused transfusion lines.The catheter connected to the line was then damaged and remained inside the vessel.Since the fragment that was inside the skin was not visible, however gave a sense when touched, an echography was performed upon consultation with a doctor.An incision was later performed by a surgeon to remove the fragment.The fragment of the catheter was successfully removed from the patient.There were no other devices or equipment being used with the reported product.
|