| Catalog Number |
03.614.019 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Dull, Blunt (2407)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
11/07/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the during a c2-c7 level posterior cervical fusion procedure performed on (b)(6) 2017; surgeon was torqueing off set screws with stardrive screwdriver shaft and the shaft stripped and surgeon was unable to torque.Second stardrive screwdriver shaft was used and the same thing happened.Surgeon used the t15 driver in the h2h kit and torqued off.The surgery was delayed by ten (10) minutes, there is no consequence for the patient.This report is for one (1) stardrive screwdriver shaft t15/self-retaining qc this is report 1 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device history record (dhr) review: manufacturing location: monument; manufacturing date: april 28, 2015; supplier: (b)(4).Part no: 03.614.019, lot # 7867540 (non-sterile) -stardrive screwdriver shaft t15/self-retaining qc.Quantity (b)(4).No nonconformance records (ncrs) were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Components reviewed: raw material part no: 11156, lot no: 5265803 received from (b)(4).Certificate of conformity from (b)(4) meet specification.Raw material receiving/put away checklist meet specification.Investigation summary: investigation selection: investigation site: (b)(4).Selected flow(s): 3.Damaged: visual | examples: deformed/bent/cracked.Visual inspection: upon visual inspection of the complaint device it can be seen that the part has no damage at all, as well as the distal (coupling part) and proximal (screw driver) have just a few/slight signs of usage (wear and tear).Furthermore, the article is in a very good condition.Summary: complained issue could not be replicated and/or confirmed based on the received part.Unfortunately we are not able to determine the exact reason for this occurrence, but we have to assume that during the operation an application error may have taken place.To prevent such problems, it is necessary to operate according to the technique guide (b)(4).Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: april 28, 2015.Supplier: (b)(4).No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The component parts and raw material documentation was also reviewed and met specification.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|