|
The reason for this complaint was due to an instrument failure.This event occurred during surgery near the patient.There was another suitable device available, no delay in surgery was noted, surgery was completed as intended, there was no risk or adverse event reported and the instrument was inspected prior to surgery and was found to be acceptable.The lot number or revision level were not reported, therefore this instrument could not be linked to a specific device history record (dhr) or the actual date of manufacture could not be determined with confidence.Complaint database review showed previous complaints but there were no indications that this instrument has a design or material deficiency.The summary of complaints shows 12 for dull/worn, 25 for mixed product/label, 1 for bent, 25 for broke/cracked/damaged, 1 for revision surgery, 10 for end of life and 11 for blank.This event is attributable to damage incurred from prolonged use and through misuse or rough handling which surgical instruments are subjected to.This is not an event associated with a product failure, malfunction or issue.There are no indications that this instrument has a design or material deficiency therefore no containment of inventory is required.
|