| Catalog Number |
186770245 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Not Applicable (3189)
|
| Date of Event |
01/09/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Device is available for evaluation.Investigation will be conducted.Follow up will be filed with the investigation results.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During procedure, the surgeon loaded up a 7x45mm viper prime screw to implant into right side of l5.While extending the stylet through the pedicle, the stylet became bent and needed to be replaced with a new one.Because the stylet was so bent, it was very difficult for the surgical tech to remove it from the viper prime inserter.We tried to back it out first by connecting a set screw inserter to the stylet depth adjustor and backing it out but the stylet was too bent to be fully backed out of the x tab screw and became stuck.We then tried unthreading the x tab screw and attempted to remove the x tab from the inserter and stylet.At this point the surgical tech used pliers on the screw head and attempted to pull apart the screw from the inserter and the screw head and x-tab slid off but the screw shaft remained stuck on the stylet and inserter.The surgical tech then had to use pliers directly onto the shaft and at this point the screw shaft was removed.The stylet was still difficult to remove from the inserter and we were able to get it out by using pliers to ¿un-bend¿ it.I would suggest including a proper procedure for removing a bent stylet from and inserter in the technique guide as this information is currently not available in the guide.I would also suggest looking into making the stylets for viper prime stiffer so that they are less likely to be bent during procedures.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Visual evaluation of the returned device showed witness marks on the screw body.The saddle was also dislodged.A review of the device history record was conducted.No issues were identified during the manufacturing and release of this product that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.A trend analysis was conducted.No emerging trends were found requiring further actions.A definite root cause cannot be positively determined at the moment.The likely cause of the saddle falling off is the instrument being subjected to unanticipated high amount of forces.As there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer and no systemic trends were found, this complaint file will be closed with no further action required.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|