|
A review of the returned product and radiographs suggest that the reported event of "rod fracture" is due to the length of unsupported rod between levels l5 and s2 in conjunction with extreme bends resulting in high preload conditions and subsequent material fatigue.Patient's post index surgery activity is unknown.Labeling review: ".Potential risks identified with the use of this system, which may require additional surgery, include: bending, fracture or loosening of implant component(s) loss of fixation." ".Correct selection of the implant is extremely important.The potential for success is increased by the selection of the proper size of the implant.While proper selection can minimize risks, the size and shape of human bones present limitations on the size and strength of implants.Metallic and internal fixation devices cannot withstand the activity levels and/or loads equal to those placed on normal, healthy bone.These devices are not designed to withstand the unsupported stress of full weight or load bearing alone." ".Loads on the device produced by load bearing and by the patient's activity level will dictate the longevity of the implant." ".Preoperative instructions to the patient are essential.The patient should be made aware of the limitations of the implant and potential risks of the surgery.The patient should be instructed to limit post-operative activity, as this will reduce the risk of bent, broken or loose implant components.The patient must be made aware that implant components may bend, break or loosen even though restrictions in activity are followed.".
|
|
On (b)(6) 2017 a patient underwent a posterior spinal fusion procedure at l4-s1 levels.Late (b)(6), the patient experienced pain, radiographs showed a fractured rod.On (b)(6) 2017 a revision procedure took place replacing the rod and reinforcing the construct.No patient injury reported.
|