• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97712
Device Problems Overheating of Device (1437); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Erythema (1840); Fall (1848); Fever (1858); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Swelling (2091); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Burning Sensation (2146); Discomfort (2330); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Reaction (2414); Numbness (2415)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer¿s representative (rep) regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for failed back surgery syndrome and non-malignant pain.It was reported the patient informed a rep at a normal follow up visit that their nutritionist told them the ¿foreign object in their back was unhealthy and it should be removed.¿ the patient also stated it never was therapeutic, and they have multiple health issues on top of their pain.The healthcare professional (hcp) was going to explant.The surgery was planned, but had not yet been scheduled.No further complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.It was reported that they were very uncomfortable, unable to adjust unit to meet their needs.Right leg very numb, which in turn caused them to fall.The site where the battery pack was placed made it very uncomfortable to wear pants.Constant pain, burning, very uncomfortable.Charging the unit made this worse.Patient had the implant removed on (b)(6) 2018.Manufacturer reps were not helpful in finding new adjustments, the uncomfortableness and pain were unbearable.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected to both an adverse and product problem.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer.It was reported that the neurostimulator (ins) had not worked since implanted.Patient stated they saw healthcare provider back on (b)(6) and healthcare provider agreed to remove ins.Patient stated they had insurance approval for ins to be removed by (b)(6).Patient stated healthcare provider (hcp) told patient they had ins removal set up for (b)(6).Patient stated they can't wait that long and inquired for healthcare provider listings.Patient further clarified that they had been falling, having pain and patient had been uncomfortable since ins was implanted.Patient clarified they could only get comfortable on the toilet.Patient stated on time they fell asleep on the toilet and fell off the toilet hitting their head on the corner of the tub.Patient added the ins area around the incision was seriously swollen and red.Patient saw hcp on (b)(6) 2017 for the area being swollen and hcp prescribed patient an antibiotic.Patient stated they went to sleep on the (b)(6) and woke up freezing so they went outside in the sun.Patient stated they had a serious reaction when they went out to the sun.Patient started swelling the next day.Patient stated by sunday their face was swollen so large they could hardly see and open their eyes.Patient stated another time they had a temperature of 104 and went to the er.Patient stated bottles of blood were taken from the patient and tests were done.Patient stated patient was on so many antibiotics and told patient had an infection.Patient stated they did not know what type of infection they had.Caller was redirected to hcp to discuss removal.It was reported that patient's neurostimulator (ins) hasn't worked for her symptoms.Patient stated she was told the ins could take up to 6 months to find the right setting.Patient stated ins has been adjusted 3 times by manufacturer's representatives.Patient was under the impression that they would be able to have access to programs and adjust ins for when patient was sitting, standing, walking, etc.Patient stated they had only been given 3 settings which 2 were the same.Patient stated she should be able to adjust whenever she needed to.Patient stated they discussed settings with rep and healthcare provider.Patient stated they had seen healthcare provider "i don't know how many times" since implant surgery.Caller was redirected to f/u with healthcare provider to discuss programming and settings.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7118556
MDR Text Key94891276
Report Number3004209178-2017-26017
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109506
UDI-Public00643169109506
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/12/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/14/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/28/2018
Device Model Number97712
Device Catalogue Number97712
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/27/2018
Date Device Manufactured05/12/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-