Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-JUG |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Unintended Movement (3026); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Anxiety (2328); No Information (3190)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the plaintiff received a gunther filter on (b)(6) 2007.It is alleged that the plaintiff was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: investigation - it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 2feb2018 as follows: ¿[pt] allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2007 via the right internal jugular vein due to deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.[pt] is alleging tilt, device unable to be retrieved.[pt] further alleges anxiety/stress.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
In follow up 3 (mfr 1820334-2017-04435) date received by manufacturer was inadvertently reported as 02/02/2018.The correct date is 3/07/2018.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation- investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating 'tilt, device unable to be retrieved, anxiety/stress'.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature and may occur during placement or during implanting period.Unknown if the reported anxiety and stress are directly related to the filter and unable to identify corresponding failure mode(s) at this time.No relevant notes on work order.No other complaints on lot.Product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|