Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-JUG |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Unintended Movement (3026); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Numbness (2415); No Information (3190); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the plaintiff received a gunther filter on (b)(6) 2006.It is alleged that the plaintiff was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Pma/510k: 510(k) k032426.The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 29/dec/2017 as follows: patient received an implant on (b)(6) 2006 via the right internal jugular vein due to deep vein thrombosis and history of bilateral pulmonary embolism.Patient is alleging numbness in legs and impaired mobility due to the device.Patient is alleging that the device is unable to be retrieved.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation - evaluation: it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating 'tilt, unable to be retrieved, numbness in legs, impaired mobility'.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature and may occur during placement or during implanting period.Unknown if the reported numbness in legs and impaired mobility is directly related to the filter and unable to identify corresponding failure mode(s) at this time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|