• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Insufficient Information (3190); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Death (1802); Pain (1994); Thrombosis (2100); Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion.
 
Event Description
It is alleged that, "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2007.It is alleged that the patient had expired (date of death unknown) without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
This additional information received on (b)(6) 2018 as follows: pt allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2007 to prevent deep vein thrombosis.Pt is alleging vena cava perforation, device unable to be retrieved.Pt.Further alleges constant pain in groin and leg, filter caused further clotting and a large thrombus within the left atrial appendage requiring prosthetic replacement.Left foot was removed due to clotting.Pt expired on (b)(6) 2015 without further explanation, discovery is continuing.An unsuccessful retrieval attempt by transfemoral approach was performed on (b)(6) 2007.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable or unchanged.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Unknown if reported patient death is related to filter.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation - it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating, "tulip, unable to retrieve (embedded), vc perf, clots/thrombus (removal of foot), pain, patient expired." cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Unknown if the reported patient death is related to the filter.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae, e.G., filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.A filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Ivc thrombotic occlusion as an outcome for cook ivc filters is addressed in the published scientific literature.Ivc thrombotic occlusion is defined as the presence of an occluding thrombus in the ivc after filter insertion and documented by ultrasound (us), ct, mr imaging or venography.This may be symptomatic or asymptomatic.Unknown if the reported peripheral vein thrombosis is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G., intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Event Description
No additional information provided at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key7123077
MDR Text Key95023981
Report Number1820334-2017-04470
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/05/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/15/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/22/2017
02/12/2018
03/21/2018
10/08/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/08/2018
03/14/2018
04/04/2018
10/19/2018
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Weight78
-
-