Patient information could not be obtained due to country privacy laws.The initial reporter is located outside the u.S., and therefore this information is not provided due to country privacy laws.Ge healthcare's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the investigation is complete.Device evaluation anticipated, but not yet begun.
|
Corrected data - report source identified as healthcare professional.Corrected data - date of device manufacture changed to dec.2, 2014.Additional manufacturer narrative - event problem evaluation codes added.Investigation completed.Root cause was determined to be a use error.No product defect identified.The site installed a new third party his (hospital information system) and with this system added many new exam procedures descriptions in which ge was not involved.These new exam procedures were not linked to the existing ddp's (default display protocols) being used by the site.When a study was viewed with any of these new exam procedures, since a local ddp was not defined, the ge default ddp was utilized to display the study and its comparisons.The ge default displays the current and prior studies on the opposite side of the monitor as the radiologist was expecting.The radiologist received a pop-up warning that the ge default ddp was being displayed, in addition there was a notice on the workstation toolbar that the default was in use, the correct study date was displayed on each open study and the comparison study had white border frames at the corners of each image sheet which designates that the image(s) is from a historical study and not part of the study currently being read.The site has added the new exam procedure descriptions to the relevant ddp's, however, they refused ddp advanced training offered by ge.
|