| Catalog Number |
4004C1030 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Stretched (1601); Physical Resistance (2578); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
11/13/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Results: the pc400¿s stretch resistant wire (sr wire) was fractured.There was no visible damage to the non-penumbra device.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the pc400¿s sr wire was fractured.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the pc400 is forcefully retracted against resistance, damage such as this may occur.The root cause of the pc400 getting stuck inside the non-penumbra microcatheter could not be determined.The pc400 pusher assembly was not returned for evaluation.A stainless steel mandrel was advanced through the non-penumbra microcatheter and out of the distal tip without an issue.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left subclavian artery using penumbra coils 400 (pc400s).During the procedure, the physician placed a non-penumbra catheter in the left brachial artery, then advanced a non-penumbra microcatheter toward the treatment site.The physician then placed two non-penumbra coils and six pc400s in the target vessel.While attempting to advance a new pc400 through the microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance after advancing the pc400 halfway through the microcatheter.It was reported that the pc400 became stuck when it was slightly advanced out of the tip of the microcatheter and became unraveled in the microcatheter while being retracted.Therefore, the physician removed the microcatheter and the pc400 altogether.The pc400 was the removed and the microcatheter was reinserted into the patient¿s body.The procedure was completed using a new pc400 and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|