| Catalog Number |
MBL-6-I-5B-S |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Shelf Life Exceeded (1567); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
08/01/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.The user indicated the event date was in (b)(6) 2017; this product lot expired in (b)(6) 2017.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: it was observed that the product was used after the expiration date.Use of the product after the stated expiration date could cause the product to underperform.This is the most likely cause for the reported observation.Prior to distribution, all 6 shooter saeed multi-band ligators are subjected to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered remote.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.Additional comments regarding this report: based on the information provided that the product was used after the expiration date, a cook representative has been directed to contact the medical facility involved in an effort to promote further education and understanding related to appropriate usage of this product.H3 other text : investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.The user indicated the event date was in (b)(6) 2017; this product lot expired in (b)(6) 2017.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: it was observed that the product was used after the expiration date.Use of the product after the stated expiration date could cause the product to underperform.This is the most likely cause for the reported observation.Prior to distribution, all 6 shooter saeed multi-band ligators are subjected to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered remote.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.Additional comments regarding this report: based on the information provided that the product was used after the expiration date, a cook representative has been directed to contact the medical facility involved in an effort to promote further education and understanding related to appropriate usage of this product.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During an endoscopic variceal ligation (evl), the physician used a cook 6 shooter saeed multi-band ligator.There was no band retention; the bands did not hold the varices [bands slips off site prematurely].
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved confirmed the report.The trigger cord attached to the barrel with five (5) bands (four (4) black and one (1) amber) and one (1) deployed black band were included in the return.A loading catheter and two-way handle were used from our shelf stock to perform functional testing.The 6 shooter saeed mulit-band ligator (mbl) device was attached to an endoscope that was placed in a simulated gastrointestinal position with vacuum attached.The endoscope has an accessory channel that is 2.8 mm in diameter (olympus 2.8 gif q20 endoscope).The mbl barrel was attached onto the end of the endoscope.Simulated varices were placed at the end of the barrel, vacuum pulled and each band was fired.All five (5) bands did not constrict as intended on the simulated varices.A visual examination of the device was performed.The trigger cord was examined and all twelve (12) deployment beads were present.The beads were verified for correct location.The beads were examined using magnification and found to be correctly filled and had no evidence of excess flash.The length of the trigger cord was measured within tolerance.The trigger cord was intact and not broken.The user indicated the event date was in august 2017; this product lot expired in january 2017.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: it was observed that the product was used after the expiration date.Use of the product after the stated expiration date could cause the product to underperform.This is the most likely cause for the reported observation.Prior to distribution, all 6 shooter saeed multi-band ligators are subjected to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered remote.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|