• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 4004C0513
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/21/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the penumbra coil 400 (pc400).The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 5.0 cm from the proximal end.The stretch resistant wire (sr wire) was fractured.The embolization coil was inside its introducer sheath.The sr wire was fractured and, therefore, both the pc400 was unable to be functionally tested for the ability to track inside a microcatheter.Conclusions: evaluation of both returned pc400s revealed that their sr wires were fractured.This type of damage typically occurs due to forceful retraction of the embolization coil against resistance.If the sr wire fractures, it will result in the unintentional detachment of the embolization coil.Further evaluation of both returned pc400s revealed that their pusher assemblies were kinked.These kinks were likely incidental and may have occurred while packaging the devices for return to penumbra.The px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim) mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-02255.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the superior gluteal artery using penumbra coil 400''s (pc400's).It was noted that the patient had slight calcification.During the procedure, the physician deployed and detached four initial pc400's into the target vessel using a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim).While attempting to advance two new pc400's into the px slim, the physician connected the introducer sheath with the hub of the px slim and advanced the coils approximately twenty to thirty centimeters into px slim.The physician then felt scratching and was unable to advance the pc400's further.It was also reported that one of the pc400's unintentionally detached within the px slim.Therefore, the px slim containing the detached pc400 was removed, then the detached coil was removed from the px slim.Thereafter, the procedure was completed using the same px slim and fourteen new pc400s.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA COIL 400
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7139693
MDR Text Key95911580
Report Number3005168196-2017-02256
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548010861
UDI-Public00814548010861
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/21/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue Number4004C0513
Device Lot NumberF73405
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/14/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/23/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/29/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-