• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C0202
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 11/07/2017
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the ruby coil pusher assembly.The embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly and the proximal constraint sphere was present inside the distal detachment tip (ddt) with the fractured stretch resistant (sr) wire visible.There was a slight s-curve on the distal polymer section of the pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ruby coil revealed a detached embolization coil.The sr wire was fractured.If the sr wire fractures, the embolization coil will detach.This type of damage typically occurs due to forceful retraction against resistance.Further evaluation revealed a slight s-curve on the distal polymer section of the pusher assembly.This may be an indicator of tortuous anatomy and could have contributed to the sr wire fracture.The non-penumbra microcatheter mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using ruby coils.During the procedure, while a ruby coil was being retracted back into the non-penumbra microcatheter, it unintentionally detached.It is unknown if the physician experienced resistance.Subsequently, the detached ruby coil was removed using a snare device.The procedure was then completed using additional coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key7145826
Report Number3005168196-2017-02267
Device Sequence Number16453385
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013121
UDI-Public00814548013121
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K120330
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 11/27/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Physician
Device Expiration Date12/27/2024
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0202
Device Lot NumberF73399
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/28/2017
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/27/2017
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/26/2017
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient Weight70
-
-