• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED BABY CONTROL MOBILE INFANT WARMER; FMT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED BABY CONTROL MOBILE INFANT WARMER; FMT Back to Search Results
Model Number IW910
Device Problem Crack (1135)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).We are currently in the process of obtaining the complaint head case of the subject iw910jeu baby control mobile infant warmer from the hospital.We will provide a follow-up report once we have received the complaint head case and completed our investigation.
 
Event Description
A hospital in (b)(6) reported that the lower head casing of an iw910 mobile infant warmer was cracked.There was no patient involvement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Method: the complaint infant warmer head was not returned to fisher & paykel healthcare for evaluation.Our investigation is based on photographs of the damaged warmer head and our knowledge of the product.Results: the photographs provided showed plastic shell flaking and chipping around the screw insertion hole.Crack lines were also apparent on the left and right side rails of the lower case.Based on our knowledge of the product and this failure mode, it is likely that the observed damage on the warmer head is related to a known problem of incompatible cleaning solutions reacting with the polycarbonate plastic and acrylic components of the infant warmer.When the heater head begins to warm up during use a chemical reaction with the incompatible cleaning solution results in gradual crazing and cracking of the heater head.We note that the subject warmer was manufactured in 2005 and is almost 12 years old.The infant warmer service manual for the affected unit features a diagram of the infant warmer which highlights polycarbonate and acrylic components and states the following: "caution do not clean the highlighted plastic surfaces with proprietary cleaning products containing either hydroxides, hypochlorites, peroxides, glutaraldehyde or cleaning products with a greater than 30% alcohol base"; "caution the chemicals used in these proprietary cleaning products may lead to discolouration, crazing and eventual cracking of the highlighted plastic surfaces." we have since revised our cleaning instructions to recommend specific proprietary cleaning wipes.
 
Event Description
A hospital in (b)(6) reported that the lower head casing of an iw910 mobile infant warmer was cracked.There was no patient involvement.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BABY CONTROL MOBILE INFANT WARMER
Type of Device
FMT
Manufacturer (Section D)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, auckland 2013
NZ  2013
Manufacturer (Section G)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, auckland 2013
NZ   2013
Manufacturer Contact
sharon kuruvilla
173 technology drive
suite 100
irvine, CA 92618
9494534000
MDR Report Key7146250
MDR Text Key95917129
Report Number9611451-2017-01236
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FMT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K971695
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/27/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/26/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberIW910
Device Catalogue NumberIW910
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/02/2005
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-