• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CASHEL SABER 6MM4CM 90; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CASHEL SABER 6MM4CM 90; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 48006004S
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/29/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Device history record (dhr) review was conducted and the product met quality requirements for product acceptance.This device is available for analysis but has not yet been received.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Event Description
During preparation, it was reported that the tip of the saber balloon catheter was fractured.The saber balloon was replaced with a new unknown balloon catheter and the procedure was successfully completed.There was no reported patient injury.This was a shunt pta.The lesion was the shunt.The patient¿s vessel level of tortuosity was unknown.The lesion was not calcified.The rate of stenosis was unknown.The product will be returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received and the device was received with the distal tip separated in two.(b)(4).During preparation, it was reported that the tip of the saber balloon catheter was fractured.Additional information was received and the device was received with the distal tip separated in two.The saber balloon was replaced with a new unknown balloon catheter and the procedure was successfully completed.There was no reported patient injury.This was a shunt percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta).The lesion was the shunt.The patient¿s vessel level of tortuosity was unknown.The lesion was not calcified.The rate of stenosis was unknown.One non-sterile unit of saber 4mm10cm 90 was received coiled inside a plastic.Per visual analysis the balloon was previously inflated/deflated, the distal tip of the balloon device was found separated and the tip separated section was received for analysis in a small pouch.No damages were noted in the device.The separated tip areas were inspected under microscope and it was noticed that the separated area presented evidence of elongations and frayed edges.The elongations and frayed edges observed suggest that the device was induced to stretching/pulling events that exceeds the material yield strength prior to the separation.A device history record (dhr) review of lot 17220091 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿distal tip cracked during prep,¿ also referred to as fractured, was not confirmed since no cracks or fractures were found on the received device.However, a tip separation was observed with the tip received for analysis.The root cause of the saber tip separation found could not be conclusively determined during the analysis.Based on the limited information available for review, concomitant device factors and handling factors likely contributed to the separated tip reported as evidenced by the elongations and frayed edges found during analysis.According to the instructions for use, which is not intended as a mitigation, ¿prior to angioplasty, the catheter should be examined to verify functionality and integrity, and ensure that its size and shape are suitable for the specific procedure for which it is to be used.Do not use if product damage is suspected or evident.Proper functioning of the catheter depends on its integrity.Care should be used when handling the catheter.Damage may result from kinking, stretching, or forceful wiping of the catheter.Forceful handling can result in catheter separation and the subsequent need to use a snare or other medical interventional techniques to retrieve the pieces.Always verify integrity of the catheter after removal.¿ neither the product analysis nor the dhr review suggests that the failures reported could be related to the manufacturing process.Therefore, no corrective/preventive actions will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SABER 6MM4CM 90
Type of Device
CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CASHEL
cahir road
cashel, tipperary FL 33014
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CASHEL
cahir road
cashel, tipperary
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60th ave
miami lakes, FL 33014
MDR Report Key7146967
MDR Text Key95920236
Report Number9616099-2017-01734
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
UDI-Device Identifier20705032068748
UDI-Public20705032068748
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K971010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/25/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2018
Device Model Number48006004S
Device Catalogue Number48006004S
Device Lot Number17220091
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/27/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date11/29/2017
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/29/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/26/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/27/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/25/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/09/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-