Reporter¿s phone number was not provided.Device manufacture date is unknown.This device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.During repair, it was determined that the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to wear from normal use and servicing.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the compact air drive device motor was seized, jammed and heavy moving.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for starting behavior, power with the test bench, excessive noise, untrue running, triggers for forward and reverse mode, air leak, cannulation, general condition and status of development.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|