No medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.Medical records were provided and reviewed.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Medical records review: the patient with deep vein thrombosis (dvt) and bilateral pulmonary embolus (pe) had a vena cava filter deployed in an infrarenal position.A post deployment venogram was also done to confirm proper placement of the device.Approximately one year post filter deployment, the patient was found to have dvt and bilateral pe.The patient was started on an anticoagulation drip and discharged on continued anticoagulation.Approximately one year later, the patient again experienced dvt and pe.An abdominal and pelvic ct scan demonstrated the filter to be in place and a large fibroid uterus continuing to compress the ivc as well as the distal aspect of the filter.No further information is noted regarding the patient¿s current status.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
A manufacturing review was performed.The lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.The device was not returned for evaluation and images were not provided for review.However, medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately two year post filter deployment, patient was found to have bilateral pe during hospital admittance.Approximately three years post filter deployment, the patient again experienced pulmonary emboli.Ct scans performed over this period of time demonstrated the filter to be in place.Therefore, based on the provided medical records, it can be confirmed the patient experienced pe after filter implantation.However, the origin of the pe and the relationship to the filter has not been established in the medical records.Additionally, the investigation is inconclusive for the alleged filter tilt based on the provided medical records.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review:the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings: movement, migration or tilt of the filter are known complications of vena cava filters.Note: it is possible that complications such as those described in the "warnings", "precautions", or "potential complications" sections of this instructions for use may affect the recoverability of the device and result in the clinician's decision to have the device remain permanently implanted.Potential complications: movement, migration or tilt of the filter are known complications of vena cava filters.Acute or recurrent pulmonary embolism.This has been reported despite filter usage.It is not known if thrombi passed through the filter, or originated from superior or collateral vessels.Filter tilt, filter malposition.
|