• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SMTSFT0406
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Advance (2524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 12/07/2017
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was fractured approximately 31.0 cm from the proximal end and had a torque device distal to the fractured location.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation of the first returned penumbra smart coil (smart coil) revealed that the embolization coil winds were offset and the pusher assembly was severely kinked.If the introducer sheath is not properly aligned inside the hub of the microcatheter prior to advancement, resistance may be encountered.If the device is further advanced against resistance, damage such as offset coil winds may occur.Further evaluation of the returned device revealed that the pusher assembly was severely kinked.This kink likely occurred due to forceful advancement against resistance.Prior to attempting to functionally test the smart coil through a demonstration microcatheter, the severe kink in the pusher assembly could not be advanced through the introducer sheath and, therefore, the smart coil could not be functionally tested through a demonstration microcatheter.Evaluation of the second returned smart coil revealed that the pusher assembly was fractured.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the device is forcefully advanced against resistance, damage such as a kink may occur.Subsequently, if the kink is attempted to be straightened, damage such a fracture may occur.Due to the fracture in the pusher assembly the smart coil could not be functionally tested through a demonstration microcatheter.The non-penumbra microcatheter mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2018-00056.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the anterior communicating artery (acom) using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, the physician successfully placed two coils using a non-penumbra microcatheter.The physician then was unable to advance two smart coils into the microcatheter, and therefore the smart coils were removed.The procedure was then completed using the same microcatheter and additional coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key7169864
Report Number3005168196-2018-00057
Device Sequence Number1476232
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548015071
UDI-Public00814548015071
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryTC
PMA/510(K) Number
K160832
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 12/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Physician
Device Expiration Date05/08/2021
Device Catalogue Number400SMTSFT0406
Device Lot NumberF69256
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/03/2018
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/07/2017
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/05/2018
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age56 YR
-
-