|
(b)(6) clinical study.It was reported that in-stent restenosis occurred.In (b)(6) 2012, the patient was referred for cardiac catheterization.Subsequently, index procedure was performed.The target lesion #1 was located the proximal left circumflex artery (lcx) with 99% in stent restenosis (isr) of a bare metal stent (bms) and was 10 mm long with a reference vessel diameter of 2.5 mm.The lesion was treated with pre-dilatation and placement of a 2.50 x 12 mm promus element¿ plus drug-eluting stent, with 0% residual stenosis.The target lesion #2 was located the mid right coronary artery (rca) with 90% isr of a bms and was 30 mm long with reference vessel diameter of 2.5 mm.The target lesion was treated with pre-dilatation and placement of a 2.50 x 32 mm promus element¿ plus des, with 0% residual stenosis.One day post procedure, the patient was discharged on clopidogrel.In (b)(6) 2017, the patient presented to emergency department due to shortness of breath and was hospitalized on the same day.The patient was further referred to cardiac catheterization.The patient¿s coronary angiography revealed 25% proximal stenosis, widely patent des in lcx and 95% ostial stenosis, subtotal severe isr of rca (probable isr of 2.50 x 32 mm promus element¿ plus des deployed in mid rca at the time of index procedure).Site has been queried further for confirming the details of isr noted in rca (whether it was referred to study stent deployed in mid rca at the time of index procedure or of another stent placed in rca vessel 10 years before the index procedure).Post index procedure, severe isr of proximal rca and mid rca was treated with plain balloon angioplasty.The patient also received medications in response to the event.The following day, the event was considered as resolved and the patient was discharged.
|