• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC. BD INSYTE¿ AUTOGUARD¿ SHIELDED IV CATHETER; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC. BD INSYTE¿ AUTOGUARD¿ SHIELDED IV CATHETER; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 381823
Device Problems Delivered as Unsterile Product (1421); Device Packaging Compromised (2916)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/24/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation and/or device history review, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that ¿the package was turned over¿.After bd received the customer sample of the bd insyte¿ autoguard¿ shielded iv catheter, it was determined that the package was open, thus a sterile breach.There was no report of injury or medical intervention.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: one sample unit was received for evaluation by our quality engineer team.Upon examination, the package was observed to be open at both ends of the blister pack.The packages were analyzed under uv light as the adhesive used is uv fluorescent.The analysis revealed an adequate amount of top web adhesive.Although the packages were observed to be partially opened, there was no physical evidence to confirm or to support manufacturing process related issues for the defect.Lot analysis device/batch history record review: yes findings: as this complaint was a mdr; -dhr review was performed on the lot number 5219908 the lot number was packaged on packaging line 8 from august 9, 2015 thru august 14, 2015.Per review of the dhr¿s it was concluded that all required challenges samples and testing was performed per specification in accordance with the set-up and in-process sampling plans.Set-up and in-process samples (included but not limited) blister thickness, bad seal/cut/holes, seal transfer width and package leak test were performed on various stages throughout the process, all the inspections passed per specifications.Visual analysis observations and testing: received one unused iag 22ga unit in partially opened package from the lot number; 5219908.Visual/microscopic examination: the package was opened at the both ends of the blister pack.The analysis of top web adhesive: the product characteristics require a minimum of 1/8¿ seal transfer.This characteristic was met.In addition the paper top web of the returned unit was analyzed under uv light.The glue used to seal the top and bottom webs is uv fluorescent.The analysis revealed an adequate of top web adhesive.The key variables that affect seal strength are: seal transfer/width and top web glue.Both of these variables were looked at during the investigation.Investigation samples(s) meet manufacturing specifications: yes; the returned unit provided for evaluation for this incident met the manufacturing specification requirements in regards to package seal integrity poor/questionable.Investigation conclusion: the defect package seal integrity poor/questionable as stated in the description of the complaint was confirmed with the returned unit.No anomalies were found and all the process characteristics that directly influence the seal strength were observed to be within specification.The units were acceptable per specification requirements.Did the evaluation confirm the customer's experience with the bd product? yes; the customer experience was confirmed based on the evaluation that was performed on the returned unit.Were we able to reproduce the customer's experience with the bd product? no; it was not necessary to achieve reproduction of the customer¿s experience, as the defect was confirmed.Relationship of device to the reported incident: indeterminate comment: although the packages were observed to be partially opened, there was no physical evidence to confirm or to support manufacturing process related issues for the defect.Capa (b)(4) has been opened to investigate the package open seal defects and implement corrective actions.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD INSYTE¿ AUTOGUARD¿ SHIELDED IV CATHETER
Type of Device
INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC.
9450 south state street
sandy UT 84070
MDR Report Key7183970
MDR Text Key97482909
Report Number1710034-2017-00532
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FOZ
UDI-Device Identifier00382903818235
UDI-Public00382903818235
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K952861
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,other,user facility
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/23/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/11/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date07/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number381823
Device Lot Number5219908
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/19/2017
Date Manufacturer Received12/19/2017
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-