• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX INC. VITEK® 2 ANC TEST KIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX INC. VITEK® 2 ANC TEST KIT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 21347
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
An internal biomérieux investigation was performed with results as follows: the biomérieux internal cap d-10 strain was rehydrated and subcultured under anaerobic conditions.Testing included individual organism suspensions on anc cards from four different lots, in duplicate, and the vitek® ms.Exper/essay 5491/108 the eight (8) anc cards tested resulted in low discrimination identifications of multiple clostridium species, not the expected result.Testing with the vitek® ms resulted in the expected identification of p.Granulosum with a 99.5%confidence value.Review of the customers p.Anaerobius results against expected reactions for p.Granulosum demonstrated six atypical negative reactions (ellm, pyra, arg, pvate, amani, drib) and atypical positive morphology (gpc) according to the anc knowledge base and contributing to the misidentification.The customer reports a result of unidentified when entering morphology as gpr but this lab report was not saved for submittal.An increased number of atypical negative results can indicate a strain with decreased viability, user set up error or an atypical strain.Quality system review of the most recent quarterly trend report, 2017 q2, did not identify this complaint as a systemic quality issue.This is an atypical strain.
 
Event Description
A customer in the united states notified biomérieux of discrepant results associated with vitek® 2 anc test kit (reference 21347).The customer reported that they missed cap d-b sample d10.Customer reported peptostreptococcus anaerobius based on a coccobacilli nomenclature, but should have been propionibacterium acnes (old nomenclature) or cutibacterium acnes (new nomenclature) using a bacilli morphology.The customer repeated on their second swab with bacilli morphology and got low discrimination with several clostridium species.Bacilli morphology did not show until day seven (7) of incubation.Customer tested at 48 hours after subculturing two times.There is no indication or report from the laboratory or physician that the discrepant result led to any adverse event related to a patient's state of health.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK® 2 ANC TEST KIT
Type of Device
VITEK® 2 ANC TEST KIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX INC.
595 anglum road
saint louis MO 63042
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMERIEUX INC.
595 anglum road
saint louis MO 63042
Manufacturer Contact
ellen weltmer
595 anglum road
st. louis, MO 63042
MDR Report Key7185432
MDR Text Key97741607
Report Number1950204-2018-00022
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JSP
UDI-Device Identifier03573026144364
UDI-Public03573026144364
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K910666
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/12/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/12/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/16/2018
Device Catalogue Number21347
Device Lot Number2440202103
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/15/2016
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-