| Catalog Number |
HJL016-40-N |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Occlusion Within Device (1423)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Occlusion (1984)
|
| Date of Event |
12/15/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
We have received a piece of the explanted graft for evaluation.However, the returned section of the graft was not the section that had occlusion.The inner surface of the graft looked smooth and did not show any sign of occlusion.Doctor had also mentioned that he found a hole in the graft.Doctor thinks he might have punctured the graft while dissecting.So, he replaced that section of the graft with a different procol graft.A thrombectomy is usually performed to remove the thrombus using standard atraumatic percutaneous or surgical techniques as stated in our ifu, adverse events including thrombosis/occlusion of the graft could occur with the use of this vascular access graft.Our procol clinical data had shown that the graft may require intervention prior to 6 month after implant.The results from the preclinical and clinical data provide reasonable assurance that the procol device is safe and effective for patients who already have at least one failed prosthetic access graft.(b)(4) units from this lot has been sold.We have not received any other complaint related to this lot or any other procol lot for a similar incident.Hence, we consider this to be an isolated incident.There was no injury to the patient as the result of the incident.A new procol graft was implanted to replace the explanted graft.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The procol vascular bioprosthesis graft was placed in the lower right arm for av access.After three weeks of implant, when doctor attempted to declot the graft, he found that the graft had occluded at the apex of the graft.He also found a hole in the graft.So, he sewed both ends and abandoned the graft.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|