• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SMTSFT3H06
Device Problems Looping (1370); Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/20/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, the physician tested the smart coil in a tray of saline before attempting to advance it into the hub of the non-penumbra microcatheter.The physician then felt resistance after the smart coil formed a loop while advancing out of the tip of the introducer sheath and into the hub of the non-penumbra microcatheter, and therefore the smart coil was removed.The procedure was then completed using a new smart coil and additional coils with the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked in multiple locations.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the penumbra smart coil (smart coil) pusher assembly was kinked.These kinks were likely incidental and may have occurred from packaging the device for return to penumbra.The smart coil was attempted to be advanced through a demonstration microcatheter.While advancing the smart coil through the demonstration microcatheter, resistance was encountered as the kinks in the pusher assembly were being advanced through the microcatheter.However, the smart coil was able to be advanced completely through the microcatheter and out of the distal tip with the experienced resistance.The root cause of the reported resistance felt during the procedure and the reported looping of the smart coil could not be determined.The non-penumbra microcatheter referred to in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.Penumbra catheters and coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7204440
MDR Text Key98054822
Report Number3005168196-2018-00175
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017006
UDI-Public00814548017006
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K160832
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/21/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/18/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date12/04/2021
Device Catalogue Number400SMTSFT3H06
Device Lot NumberF73015
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/22/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/22/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/05/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age80 YR
-
-